Jarek Potiuk
Jarek Potiuk
BTW. Even now you could generate new defaults using this command and compare them / merge to make your job easier, but yeah automating it would likely be a good...
OK. Just 4 tests left to fix in 2.8 :).
The change for tests for Providers with Airflow 2.8 compatibility should be ready. That was fairly easy - there is only one case where FileTransfer operator looks like to be...
Looks green
> @potiuk Could you please tell me which command should i run to reproduce? Are we running the providers from current main against different airflow versions or are we using...
> together with OL support, so I'm trying to understand if there might be some mismatch of the provider versions there. I think the problem is connected with upath integration....
> @potiuk Airflow 2.8.4 requires (constraints) universal-path 0.1.4 which is indeed not compatible with python 3.12. However., I am not sure if this is related. The `namespace` property was added...
> @potiuk do you think #39755 will be enough to fix the test you mentioned and make the io provider + OpenLineage work well with Airflow 2.8 ? Yes. In...
> I was wondering why i could not do it. I was trying to run breeze with dev providers and Airflow 2.8.4 like you mentioned, but the fab provider required...
OK . That one is ready to be finally reviewed. All problems with compatibility with 2.8 have been solved in the test suite, also thanks to that one we found...