Jarek Potiuk

PR running here to remove it https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37745

> It will be interesting to see if uv is performant enough for you when it also goes backtracking in the wild. Hard to say - those extra requirements tend...

> For context, boto3/botocore are notoriously hard due to their large number of releases, where we have to backtrack through every single one: https://pypi.org/project/boto3/#history, https://pypi.org/project/botocore/#history. We're planning on improving the...

This is somewhat related to what I reported today in https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/2821 - similarly like in the other issue - backtracking is not only considering some really old versions of dependencies...

No. There is nothing against it.

Discussion on the devlist here: https://lists.apache.org/thread/4n5on5srh0lnlwjy92p3m00dch52o35h I think it's a nice idea and hope someone will pick it up.

> Af few providers are failing due to the get_extra_json method fom above https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39811, which means those providers would be dependant on a newer Airflow version. We should definitely avoid...

> > > > Af few providers are failing due to the get_extra_json method fom above #39811, which means those providers would be dependant on a newer Airflow version. >...

@dabla - for this one we have to make sure that the tests are "compatible" with older versions of Airflow - because that is how we are testing compatibility of...

Sure. not an easy one because Airflow schedules tasks individually - but if you would like to propose A PR on that @bruno-uy @rodolfo-nobrega - or more likely an "Airflow...