Jarek Potiuk
Jarek Potiuk
> And as a small suggestion, going forward, we’ve decided to DAG as Dag. good point. Added suggestions
Likely wrong API queries @pierrejeambrun @ephraimbuddy @uranusjr
> All related entities to a stale DAG should be removed from the UI? > > Runs related to a Stale DAG shouldn't be ever displayed. Should we expand that...
Ideally, we should make it part of the Breeze CI image (so add a step in the image building process alongside other system dependencies likely in https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/scripts/docker/install_os_dependencies.sh#L69 ) - documentation...
> Using `plantuml` would make the ERD searchable (that is, using ctrl+ / cmd+f) in the Airflow docs html without needing to open the SVG file. Whether it's worth it...
I think it's a good idea taking into acount all the dynamic complications - and also it follows the path that PEP 660 took for editable builds https://peps.python.org/pep-0660/. For dependencies...
Just for anyone looking here - this is a draft for discussion between me, @dabla and @zeroshade - we will still need to start a DISCUSSION thread for the new...
> As @potiuk mentioned, I believe this needs a devlist conversation first. Looking forward to it Yep. This one is mostly to gather learnigs, get feedback from @zeroshade and see...
Agreed. I think once we get through the "bugiixing 3.1" period we will finalize and move forward with the providers in general.