Jarek Potiuk
Jarek Potiuk
I did it provisionally since you marked "willing to submit a PR" :)
> This PR reverts a change made in #25657 to the Airflow docs home page. I understand the desire to push TaskFlow usage but don't think this is the right...
I thought a bit about that - and I think we could even visually distinguish them - use different theme for TaskFlow examples and diferent theme for Classic examples -...
> I don't think the intro page is the right place for introducing multiple ways to do one thing. An intro page is for an "Airflow-curious" person, that just wants...
> I don't think implementation details are relevant on this page. Why do we show the Classic DAG then? It's the same kind of implementation detail. All what I am...
I thought a lot about it (while running yesterday - 18km is long enough to clear the head). And I am still not really convinced we should do it this...
> Using the TaskFlow operators displays `_PythonDecoratedOperator` in the UI which is not self-explanatory IMO. BTW. I think this has been addressed in Airlfow 2.4.0
I do understand context. And I don't want to show "all possible ways". I just want to avoid people judging book (wrongly) by it's cover. Because this is what most...
> TaskFlow is different from regular operators, it uses decorators and I don't think it's immediately clear why you have to call a TaskFlow task, i.e. airflow() instead of airflow,...
I assigned you too - so if you want ot help @qcha41 -> talk directly to @HeshamMeneisi