Jarek Potiuk

> So it looks similar, but I'm not quite sure it's the same. Introducing this type of deprecation module into common.compat could make it more multi-functional, and it can be...

> @moiseenkov, I’m happy to revisit #36952, but unfortunately, I can’t commit to a specific timeline at the moment. If you have any available resources, feel free to pick it...

I am all for it @eladkal @dstandish - I think you had doubts - but I think we can do it as 'google provider specific' for now. I guess small,...

This is currently not possible in Airflow 2 - because task group is mostly a grouping construct, not logical context that can be used as dependencies - the dependencies are...

A LOT of conflicts. We moved providers to another directory, you need to resolve the conflicts/move your changes.

You need to have `FabAuthManager` conifgured. The `users` command is part of the Fab Auth Manaager https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow-providers-fab/stable/cli-ref.html. "Standard" installation now uses SimpleAuthManeager https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow/stable/core-concepts/auth-manager/simple/index.html

> > You need to have `FabAuthManager` conifgured. The `users` command is part of the Fab Auth Manaager https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow-providers-fab/stable/cli-ref.html. > > "Standard" installation now uses SimpleAuthManeager https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow/stable/core-concepts/auth-manager/simple/index.html > > Do...

> It also failed for me when using the helm chart, in fact, it does not show up in airflow subcommands but fab is installed and used for Oauth against...

OK. So it means that createUserJob template needs to be fixed. I marked it for next chart version and as good first issue. Anyone is invited to fix it.

> If anything I'm saying makes sense, I can make a PR fixing this in some direction you propose. Makes absolutely sense. Thanks for all those invstigations @mrbungie ! and...