Chrissy LeMaire

awesome!

This can be closed as the feature I needed has been delivered

Yes, waiting until #10 would be perfect. But if that's not possible then we can just remove all filters since you got the others down to such reasonable runtimes.

yes but only on github dot com. when you do it locally you have 100% control like usual

awesome_sauce x2

@claude ultrathink a complete plan for @niphlod's proposed commands based on Ola Hallengren's current scripts (attached) [MaintenanceSolution.sql](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23695699/MaintenanceSolution.sql) The scripts should include ValidateSets and no ParameterSets. Other validation as required. After...

@niphlod pls advise and if you like, guide claude on design. if you like it, then i think we should do one PR per command to get the highest quality...

yeah, this should have been dbatools.replication like dbatools.ssis. not most as new modules, but many. nevertheless. we should just mark those as incompat with core, as microsoft does not support...

@claude ``` ipmo "C:\gallery\dbatools.library\desktop\lib\Microsoft.SqlServer.Replication.dll" [Microsoft.SqlServer.Replication.Article] InvalidOperation: Unable to find type [Microsoft.SqlServer.Replication.Article]. ipmo "C:\gallery\dbatools.library\desktop\lib\Microsoft.SqlServer.RMO.dll" [Microsoft.SqlServer.Replication.Article] IsPublic IsSerial Name BaseType -------- -------- ---- -------- True False Article Microsoft.SqlServer.Replica… ``` pls fix, rmo...

seems reasonable @claude pls implement