pory
pory
I understand! With this new implementation I reuse the share component and I eliminated the share profile button stand-alone, adding the button for the function in the drop-down menu. If...
okok i get the point, i'll try a different idea
okok i get the point, i'll try a different idea
I've updated the implementation. I was thinking of a mix of what you showed me and the one similar to the one on posts, I'm not sure about the icon...
Do we wanto to disable also the recive status or just send?
I understand. I was just assuming a "soft" migration for users. I deleted the wallet and made the accounts behave as you described.
a two-step migration, maybe in the first step we add some warnings to push users to migrate and then we eliminate lifpay, so as not to do something sudden, but...
Thanks for your feedback! I removed the `DeleteConfirm` component from `confirm-modal.js` as it was unused and the first `.trim()` check in `comment.js` as suggested by @Soxasora - now any change...
I agree with just doing the migration by removing lifpay only from the UI, it's definitely easier that way.
> > The enum change required deleting/recreating the encryption key between Wallet.templateName and WalletTemplate.name to avoid P3006 errors. > > encryption key? Sorry, I was referring to the foreign key...