Pokey Rule
Pokey Rule
We might want to think a bit more carefully bout associative operators. Should prob be able to say things like "fourth operand", etc, even if parse tree uses a car-cdr...
Note that in my proposal, "next operand plus" / "previous operand plus" should work as well
Update from meet-up: 1. Define `private.operand` and `private.operation` as follows: ```typescript (a + b) + c //!1 ^
@asoee would it be helpful for me to have a look at this point? Also, would be useful to have a quick blurb in description to indicate what's supported by...
The github action works on the original repo, so presumably something broke from the tree-sitter version bump? Looks like [this repo](https://github.com/Gregoor/tree-sitter-wasms/compare/main...ruediste:tree-sitter-wasms:main) has it working, so maybe worth seeing if there's...
Weird. Good work. Might be worth just switching to `npm` if it simplifies things 🤷♂️
> If we do fix this there's no reason to not do it on all OSes. Ah didn't realise this was broken on other OSes as well > I imagine...
@josharian your suggestion of intersecting function with visible made me think of this
Yeah you shouldn't have cases where cursorless puts the same hat over both a lower and uppercase version of the same letter unless you've already tweaked the setting that @AndreasArvidsson...
If we're going this direction I think I'd opt for 3 steps: build, publish openvsix, and publish vscode. The latter two can run in parallel and both depend on build....