Lennart Poettering comments

Results 1507 comments of


                                            Lennart Poettering

RFE: Support systemd credentials

Yes, if podman has a directory where it makes these secrets/credentials available as regular files, then it would be excellent if it would set the $CREDENTIALS_PATH env var to the...

[RFC] Automatically generate deps for dlopen() deps?

alternatively, you could just process this in a "linting" context, i.e. at package building simply refuse building if the deps listed in the new ELF note are not listed under...

Extension: On-demand API to add peer credentials on every message

Yeah. I want a dbus "driver" call a client can make. Should take "as", an array of strings indicating the type of credentials the client wants to have appended implicitly...

Extension: On-demand API to add peer credentials on every message

same issue requested from dbus-broker btw: https://github.com/bus1/dbus-broker/issues/311

core: do not enforce PrivateTmp with DynamicUser if /tmp and /var/tmp are already private tmpfs

> I am not making /tmp an alias of /var/tmp as that changes too much the existing setup, where they are different directories, we can't just change that from one...

core: do not enforce PrivateTmp with DynamicUser if /tmp and /var/tmp are already private tmpfs

well, indeed we might be missing such a comment right now, but we should add it. The fact that the dirs can be the same is widely documented elsewhere. Just...

core: do not enforce PrivateTmp with DynamicUser if /tmp and /var/tmp are already private tmpfs

Am I blind? I can't see any place where PRIVATE_TMP_CONNECTED is ever set? I only see where it is checked? I don't think the enum is necessary btw. To me...

core: do not enforce PrivateTmp with DynamicUser if /tmp and /var/tmp are already private tmpfs

> Just a bit :-P It's set in load-fragment.c (if a unit has PrivateTmp=yes) and in dbus-util.c (for equivalent dbus) > > > Sorry, I meant the DISCONNECTED thing is...

core: do not enforce PrivateTmp with DynamicUser if /tmp and /var/tmp are already private tmpfs

one more thing, looks good then.

Toggle unit state - `start` if stopped and `stop` if running

Hmm, anyone knows what the precise usecase for this is? i.e. why would you want to an issue where you can't guess the possible outcome? Would be good to shed...