Lennart Poettering
Lennart Poettering
Hmm, ok, so we already have a crypttab option try-empty-password=. It defaults to off. I think we should simply make sure the token honours that setting too. i.e. pass in...
So I am a bit puzzled about this: this is hacking around shitty kernel interfaces, on systems that are just terribly set up: have huge mount tables in the main...
> > What kind of a system are we even talking about here? What kind of a system has 3000 mounts in the root mount namespace? > > It's a...
> IIUC, user instance only watches mounts and it creates .mount unit representations of global (system instance) mounts but it is not an active party wrt mounts setup. I added...
this is marked as draft still. any reason for that. (we usually don't review drafts, hence if you want this reviewed, please drop the "draft" status). i reviewed this anyway...
looks quite good actually, just minor comments.
lgtm, just please add one comment, see above. if this works for you, please drop the "draft" state
so the code does make sense to me, but i do not have any hw to test this with. @appsforartists will you track this down further? (if not we should...
you can output numbers with regular C `printf("…");`.... for example `printf("keycode: %" PRIu64 "\n", (uint64_t) key)`