P. L. Lim
P. L. Lim
astropy 6.0.1 isn't super new, so whoever takes this one please confirm that it is still a problem in `main`. Thanks!
I think we still need it to turn things off, right? Otherwise, it pulls codecov defaults? Ditching it is an upstream issue, please see https://github.com/OpenAstronomy/github-actions-workflows/issues/189
@neutrinoceros , no I think the OpenAstronomy issue is about ditching codecov and upload coverage.xml only with Actions. But maybe @Cadair can confirm.
Yes, I think patch report still useful (for now). And you can still see that in this PR.
Codecov does have a nice UI though.
OK I guess the discussions here mean we rather get rid of codecov entirely than this? Closing then.
Looks like it was you who added it in https://github.com/astropy/astropy/pull/16597 . I guess it is okay to remove if unused and private but @nstarman should confirm since it is in...
Now, now, let's not go crazy. New code API is anyone's game but please leave the existing stable code API alone unless there is a very good reason (besides style...
tl;dr -- Is this just plain refactoring or it changes the user API?
Hmm... `validCap` and `validJoin` are not in our code.