plk

Hmm, what is happening here is that extra* information is calculated per-datalist. Shorthands are a special case as they usually accompany a normal bibliography. `extradate` is being calculated for all...

I'm not sure what to do here. You have to calculate `extra*` for any datalists separately since they can have different sorting. The issue here is specific to having the...

I don't think we can do this since sorting is specifiable at a biblist level and therefore extra* labels can differ between lists. This is only really an issue when...

@moewew - we already have the mechanism for this with the `citecounter` option. I wonder if we should change the verbose styles to use this mechanism to implement this as...

For the overhead, I think that's alright in a verbose style. But I'm not sure what you mean with the filter?

We would have to alter `\printbiblist` and `\printbibliography` so that a bibcheck called, say "default" was used for the `check` argument, even if not specified, to allow verbose styles to...

You can try the verbose `.cbx` and `.bbx` you want from the `citecounter` branch. This should do everything automatically without any extra commands: ``` \documentclass[british]{article} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage{babel} \usepackage{csquotes} \usepackage[style=verbose]{biblatex} \addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib}...

- [ ] #1267 - [ ] #1190 - [ ] #1186 - [ ] #1184 - [ ] #1183 - [ ] #1169 - [ ] #1155 - [...

My general opinion here is that `@article` should be used for everything like this - the APA 7th edition is going this way since `@online` is becoming more useless since...

I like the APA route of using "HOWPUBLISHED" to indicate things like preprints etc and everything is then an `@article` (unless it obviously isn't ...) with a URL.