plk
plk
Did you update to `biber` 2.20 DEV version? This is required also.
Hmm, the above example works for me - can you post the `.bbl` file generated by `biber` for the above example?
The `.bbl` looks like you aren't using `biber` 2.20. You can check with `biber -v`. You shouldn't have to set any perl env vars and doing so will likely cause...
If you are using the binary version of `biber` from SF, you don't need any perl installed at all. You only need perl if you are checking out the github...
Can you post this to tex.stackexchange.com as you will get better help for a question like this there as this isn't confirmed as an issue with `biblatex` per se?
`biber` would need to know if the style used shorthands (and that this hadn't been overridden in the document) in order to automate this. The only way I can see...
The problem is, they are only superfluous if the style always uses the shorthand.
Well, deleting the entire `extradatacontext` will always result in strange things as at least the default is needed. However, this is an interesting use of the `extradatecontext` since it will...
Ah, sorry, I see. This is expected with the default settings as both biblists are in the same refsection and there are four entries with the same labelname in the...
Well, this is a very odd example since `book`, `book1` and `book2` are the same entry, just with different shorthands - is that realistic?