playX18

> This immediately kills ActivePlan::vm_trace_object and everything supporting that. Currently no VM uses ActivePlan::vm_trace_object. I am using this feature for data section in bytecode. Some objects are in this static...

@techraed request for review now. I've adjusted parameters to match master fuzzer success/failure rate **and** potentially have better success rate. Still need to verify this on dedicated server though

@techraed > Great!!! > > What's with checks on a server - is everything satisfiable? As we discussed in DM compared to master this branch runs 10-15x more programs compared...

@ollef > > I think you could also use "subspaces" . Kind of memory regions that can only store objects of a single type, thus some data becomes implicit Which...

> Ah, I see what you mean. What do you use for identifying types? Is it e.g. a static ID? In Sixten, new types can be made up at runtime,...

I was actually working on something like this already and had prototype working. It was precise on heap + conservative on stack API based around MMTk but I suppose with...

> iirc BDW has to do a bit of a dance to get the application threads to pause for a STW collection. We would have to do engineer this carefully...

> > Is it hand-made or somehow parsed from Intel manual? > > Hand-made and fuzz-tested against Intels XED. > > > add RW info for operands and doing it...