Philipp Kursawe

Thanks for clearing this up, maybe we can raise this over at the redux repo to ask them for an easy way to remove reducers. But I understand that is...

That pretty much lets me get back to mocha/chai. With a huge codebase you want instant test feedback and that can only be achieved by watching for changes.

@rex the package name is "glob" not "node-glob". However even with glob installed, I cannot get docco to work on Win8 x64. Still getting the same error the OP described.

can this be made as PR?

I have to agree. Unless releases, changelog is present this can not be used in production apps. Until then I'll give https://github.com/MinaSamir11/react-native-in-app-review a try. Also: enabling and monitoring github "discussions"...

Just ran into this when I tried my fav regex tester with a POSIX regex and it validated `\d+` which is not valid in POSIX regex. It should be `[0-9]+`...

problem still exists in 3.10.0

So basically the rule would have to check if the effect is a) used inside a `map`/`reduce`(?) function callback b) the result of the map call is never yielded

> I suppose one option would be to just ignore cases where a redux-saga effect is returned from a non-generator function This would be certainly the easiest approach, lets go...

> For someone that is using TypeScript and the @typescript-eslint configuration, I wonder if you could use the type information to more thoroughly test for proper usage (as [this note...