Peter Karp comments

Results 7 comments of


                                            Peter Karp

[discussion] Is the distributed version control approach through memote relevant?

Yes, I see your point that some people may choose to generate SBML from their model development tool and put that within a version control system, however, that approach is...

[discussion] Is the distributed version control approach through memote relevant?

Could you explain that a bit more? What is the relationship of the YAML file to the SBML file? Why use a different file format?

[discussion] Is the distributed version control approach through memote relevant?

Just to be clear, yes, BioCyc has moved to a subscription model, but the underlying software, Pathway Tools, is still free to academics. It offers a free, database-based version control...

[discussion] Is the distributed version control approach through memote relevant?

Hello, Technically speaking, your comments are clearly incorrect. See below. I think you would do better to try to compare and contrast the strengths and weaknesses of different technical approaches...

[discussion] Is the distributed version control approach through memote relevant?

Dear Matthias, On 3/20/18 11:07 AM, Matthias König wrote: > > Hi Peter, > > my formulation was probably too harsh. Of course database systems can > work, but until...

[discussion] Is the distributed version control approach through memote relevant?

Hi, I'm not sure I understand the question. First I will say that I have been surprised that the memote manuscript is concerned with collaborative development of metabolic models. Based...

[discussion] Is the distributed version control approach through memote relevant?

What tools were used to edit the file? How did you solve the problem that the tools might emit reactions or other components of the file in different orders? P...