pk-guest

Hello Moritz, "...._During simulation, run a few time steps with lbm.run(5u);, then place a few of the particles in the inflow stream with randomized coordinates. Don't forget to copy from...

Hi Jason, did you implemented immersed boundary for moving/rotation parts too? Is it better compare to revoxeling, or just a philosophy different? regards Peter

Hello Jason,, thx for your feedback. I tought you implemented the IBM for geometry motion. For particle is also interesting special if you want to model complex shapes. However DEM...

To couple it with external DEM tool is the easiest part. The tricky part is the solver from CFD and maybe the communication with huge number of particles, but until...

Hi Jason, I am not up to date in opensource DEM softwares, but most of them has no native GPU solver yet, or they have a lot of other limitation....

Hi, I never used open source, but liggghts should have the capability for coupling. I can check it, give me a little bit time. 10M particle is ok, still not...

Hi Jason, so you want that particles has influence on the fluid with IBM, right? I am asking because there are several understanding in the community. So which one do...

Hi, Generaly the DEM code send the position and velocity to CFD and CFD send back force and torque in defined interval. I have to check how can fluidX3D handle...

Hi, here is a simple case for transient particle generation which is must have for later DEM coupling. However with high number of particle its slow down extremly. Maybe the...

Hi, initial particle velocity is also important. So with some additional function it is possible to use. However particle vs voxelsize is still not solved. Maybe define solid as particle...