胡雨軒 Петр
胡雨軒 Петр
Indeed yes that sounds reasonable.
I see two issues here: - Currently `Keyword('a/b').name => 'a/b'`. I'm sure it's kind of a Chersterton's fence and I'm not yet aware of why it has been built that...
For the impatient, here how I would iterate through what is returned by `edn_format`: ``` python keyword_name = lambda keyword: \ keyword.name.split("/", 1)[1] if "/" in keyword.name else keyword.name strinfigy_keyword...
Aw, so sad there is [no analyzer for cljs](https://github.com/clojure/tools.analyzer.js#this-project-has-been-abandoned) :-(
btw will you get to ClojuTRE in Helsinki this week? :-)
Sorry for the delay. Indeed we could add popularity. Also, this project should be resurected ^_^
I think it does qualify as a bug, but it's quite telling that nobody reported it ^_^ Another explanation is nobody actually tried to use `::fn`.
Hello 👋 Any news on this? 🤩
No firm commitment on me, but how would you consider a PR about moving `caesium` to JNI? Would you have any guidelines or brief work description / steps to give...
That is very awesome to read!