Jack

Results 157 comments of Jack

batch-size 50 is the first one above batch-size 100 ![image](https://github.com/onedr0p/exportarr/assets/5182053/f5b1c3c0-4985-4054-9052-ef2a791fc87e) ~50 mb ~28s batch-size 150 ![image](https://github.com/onedr0p/exportarr/assets/5182053/0c65a9b0-2ce8-47c6-a2c4-a59204204723) ~50mb ~27s batch-size 200 ![image](https://github.com/onedr0p/exportarr/assets/5182053/a6fb4c5c-f3d0-4a34-8142-aeccf88ec2e8) ~28s ~50mb batch-size 300 ![image](https://github.com/onedr0p/exportarr/assets/5182053/bc668b7b-8f7e-4322-861f-4e1989978d46) ~21s ~70-100mb batch-size 500...

So almost all the attempts floated around the 50mb range until i increased the batch size which makes sense. But i think the "recommendation" should be increase batch to reduce...

no worries, ill give it a scan and test agaisnt my instance when i can

ah sorry i forgot then the holidays happened, i will give this a look this week

was able to do a proper benchmark comparison diff wise for information it is exactly the same with the `EnableAdditionalMetrics` flag 👍

@onedr0p when you have time, i think this is good to be merged

Not sure if this second approach is right either https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate/pull/24538/commits/323a247c0cc5015bb8b94140a21182cd3de0e3dc , but moved the logic away from the user configurable template over to a replace on `.x` to inject the...

sorry forgot about this pr thanks for the nudge

One alternate thought ive had while trying to debug why some of our helms get stuck in this issue is we could add some sort of ` argocd.argoproj.io/skip-reconcile-time: '300'` in...