Fred Eisele
Fred Eisele
I prefer to use pixi over devcontainers (though pixi can certainly be used in a devcontainer). Key differences and use cases between `pixi` and devcontainers ### Scope of control Pixi...
> pixi is a new thing to me, but it looks modern. I will learn it and try to integrate it based on your work. Yes, pixi is very new....
Where are we at with this? Do you need something from me?
> Hi @phreed, thank you for your work on this. > > I just wanted to mention that I'm not currently full-time on this project—apologies for any delays in my...
That branch has a bunch of vanderbilt specific stuff so I will need to back the changes into this PR. Which pieces are you interested in having incorporated? p.s. I...
> Hi @phreed, I really appreciate your contribution! Your PR motivates me to learn more about the Pixi build and the monkey patching mechanism. Although I still couldn't override the...
> After learning the code, I believe that the Pixi build system is modern and can achieve the same goal that I did with the Makefile and the dev container....
@yuezk I am considering packaging the command line application as a conda-forge package. Here is an example of a substantial illustrative package (both command-line and GUI): * https://prefix.dev/channels/conda-forge/packages/freecad * https://github.com/conda-forge/freecad-feedstock...
Could we relax the strict version dependency?
I think the PR should include the cmake support files: * speexdspConfig.cmake * speexdsp.pc Is there a reason you replaced the `speexdsp_config_types.h.in` with `speexdsp_config_types.h`?