Peter Hoddie
Peter Hoddie
> It's not; it ensures that the range doesn't need to be updated every year ??? The range only needs to be updated in years when the tests are modified,...
The linter is now happy and I've attempted to resolve all comments.
The helpful feedback from @anba have been applied. As per discussion with @gibson042, we'll break this up into multiple PRs based on the test plan, when available.
Welcome, @tesanders. There were some issues connecting to ESP32 devices with a built-in USB port, like the ESP32-S3, on macOS and Linux. Working with @mshioji, we were able to find...
As a new delegate, I found Allen's guide to be incredibly helpful, even encouraging. I never took it as an admonition not to participate, but rather to understand the norms...
cc: @hipsterbrown
@anba, thanks for the review. > Using new Date(1970) is a bit confusing, because it can easily be misinterpreted as creating a Date object for the year 1970, even though...
@anba – I've changed `new Date(1970)` to `new Date(0)` everywhere. That should invite the fewest questions moving forward. For `Object.defineProperty` let's try your rule: either a minimal property descriptor with...
> This will need a rebase Done. > also, which tests remain that do exercise new Date(), and Math.random()? If those still exist then I’m fine with this landing. This...
GCC atomics aren't available on ESP32 family RISC-V MCUs. But, we have code in place that **should** account for that. I'll take a look. > ESP-IDF v5.4.1 (Sorry if this...