Philip Top

I can verify this does produce an inconsistent result. Not entirely sure what to do about it though. The fact that it works on g++ is either an inconsistent fluke...

There are a couple different ways I see to fix this. They all have some drawbacks. The first is to make one of the internal results arrays `mutable`. Then when...

What is the code you are using to parse the arguments?

Going to need a few more details to help with anything. If you can point to any code or code blocks in CLI11 you think might be the source of...

can you try this with the `validate_positionals` modifier and see if the error is the same. My guess is that will do what you want in this case.

It requires positionals to have validation on them, yes. In the example given you are using the `remaining` to capture all the arguments after a particular prefix command. which forces...

You can use the footer to add a user specified note. after #786 gets merged there will be a usage field that can also be user specified. A couple other...

Well from what I can tell ``` namespace date { bool lexical_cast(const std::string &in, date::year_month_day &val) { return val.ok(); } } ``` would get called but doesn't do anything and...

You can try putting the overloaded streaming operators in the date namespace. The name lookup with header libraries is bit "questionable"/"confusing" The purpose of a validator is to restrict what...

The intention was that the option name output should be such that it could be fed into add_option and it would register the same. So no modifiers to hide the...