Philip Top
Philip Top
I think I want @henryiii to comment on this. If he is ok with it, I can help fix the test cases and go through it in more detail.
I will start working on fixing some of the tests to adjust for this soon. @LostInCompilation are you still available to help finish this up?
One other thing to try is using the ADR capabilities in C++. Basically would involve having all your magic enums defined in a particular namespace, then defining the lexical cast...
I am pretty sure the first solution would break any code that already uses a customization for lexical cast, so I am not sure that is a viable solution.
The basic issue is that you have a bunch of classes that you would like to do a specific lexical cast for overriding the built in one. It is possible...
Ok, I am not sure there is any viable path in the current codebase for that. What I would propose is adding an object_category::custom. This would be detected via an...
ok, I see, that could work, just forcing the lexical cast to a single generic template, all the existing custom overloads would still work since they are specialized. To be...
This would have the advantage over the custom object_category, in that you wouldn't be forced to override all the methods, just the ones you need.
The way it works is it will store whatever string is saved in the option after the processing. In this case I think that is whatever the output of the...
related to #780