Barry Smith

These issues have been addressed in the recent work on updating BFO for the purposes of validating BFO as an ISO standard. More details will be released soon.

[image: image.png] from OGMS On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 9:18 PM Chris Mungall wrote: > cc @phismith > > — > You are receiving this because you were mentioned....

I am strongly in favor of adding 'provides benefit to'. It should be defined as a relation between a process and a biological continuant. For instance interacting with A provides...

Can you explain in what sense BFO has a materialistic view of processes Thinking processes Changes in stock exchange processes Changes in temperature processes Etc etc have all been modeled...

'frequency of condition' doesn't make much sense -- when we talk of frequency we are talking about outbreaks, or something like that 'modifies' is, though, an improvement over 'contributes to'....

On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 7:02 PM, Chris Mungall wrote: > Proposed schema for evolved processes. Evolved processes are either (1) > the realization of a single function (2)...

I would certainly approve of a change along these lines BS On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 5:40 AM, matentzn wrote: > I am trying to consolidate relevant ontologies that...

On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 1:12 PM cstoeckert wrote: > Here are ones that I noticed so far. Am reaching out to others to collect > more. > cco:has_familial_relationship_to...

The root node of PATO is "quality"; hence we cannot re-use this term with another meaning. To find out what term (noun or noun phrase) we should use, we should...

"quality trait" is acceptable with children such as "commercial quality trait" "nutritional quality trait" and so forth But then we still need an adequate general definition of "quality trait"