Philipp Rudiger
Philipp Rudiger
Yeah, this is awkward to fix. The only way to get all instances would be to keep (weak) references to all instances of a class or iterating over all objects...
Thanks, the test should probably just use an `int` then.
Seems to be to do with over-eagerly invalidating the root.
I think the only way forward we have here is to move to keyword only. There's no reasonable route to standardizing on consistently making the `default` argument the first positional...
I don't think it's ready, I want to revisit this as part of a more general plan for composite types as well as dataclass and pydantic integrations.
Actually this proposal is probably not sufficient for my purpose, what I really would need is a `preempt` keyword which basically says "execute me, cancel any existing events and process...
I like not having to import it though :/
No, I think the plan is for us to release a last patch or minor release for 1.x pretty soon and then create a `branch-1.x` which will be used for...
I like the idea of allowing the keyword specification to tell it to pass the parameters in explicitly but I absolutely don't follow the point of the react thing. Why...
So currently I'm a strong -1 on `react=True` and `@param.react()` but may be missing something.