Phil Henderson

Confirmed running the daos_agent as the user in https://build.hpdd.intel.com/job/daos-stack/job/daos/job/PR-14937/29/

The errors seen in https://build.hpdd.intel.com/job/daos-stack/job/daos/job/PR-14937/33/testReport/ are known issues: - https://daosio.atlassian.net/browse/DAOS-16495 - https://daosio.atlassian.net/browse/DAOS-16496

Being replaced by https://github.com/daos-stack/daos/pull/15556 and https://github.com/daos-stack/daos/pull/15574

Just looking at one run of Medium Verbs Provider, there are only a few tests that seem to benefit greatly from the change: https://daosio.atlassian.net/browse/DAOS-15886?focusedCommentId=128674

Looks like we have the `daos_metrics` file listed twice with a duplicate entry causing https://github.com/daos-stack/daos/pull/14664#issuecomment-2200802270

@kjacque this PR needs to run with the `recovery` tag/feature.

> some of the hw medium tests did not run with tcp provider and ran with verbs: https://build.hpdd.intel.com/job/daos-stack/job/daos/job/PR-13365/8/artifact/Functional%20Hardware%20Medium%20Verbs%20Provider/daos_test/suite.py/job.log @daltonbohning @phender is there a tcp version of daos_test suite that runs...

> > > some of the hw medium tests did not run with tcp provider and ran with verbs: https://build.hpdd.intel.com/job/daos-stack/job/daos/job/PR-13365/8/artifact/Functional%20Hardware%20Medium%20Verbs%20Provider/daos_test/suite.py/job.log @daltonbohning @phender is there a tcp version of daos_test suite...

https://jenkins-3.daos.hpc.amslabs.hpecorp.net/job/daos-stack/job/daos/job/PR-16919/4/ completed all unit testing and ran all three functional VM stages. The Functional on EL 9 stage did encounter the https://daosio.atlassian.net/browse/DAOS-17758 known issue with the `daos_test/dfuse.py` test. All other...

> @phender correct me if im wrong, but for 2.6 we should just remove the mux for ompi, and not backport this entire PR? Yes, https://daosio.atlassian.net/browse/DAOS-18334 was only asking for...