Philip Helger

It might still be a good idea to skip indentical JARs... it is kind of annoying anyway. Same in 9.4.9

Sure. See the attached file [jetty-dups.txt](https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/files/1925885/jetty-dups.txt)

Example for a duplicate are e.g. the JavaFX things: ``` javafx.fxml.JavaFXBuilder$ObjectBuilder scanned from multiple locations: jar:file:///C:/Program%20Files/Java/jdk1.8.0_171/jre/lib/ext/jfxrt.jar!/javafx/fxml/JavaFXBuilder$ObjectBuilder.class, jar:file:///C:/Program%20Files/Java/jdk1.8.0_171/jre/lib/ext/jfxrt.jar!/javafx/fxml/JavaFXBuilder$ObjectBuilder.class - org.eclipse.jetty.annotations.AnnotationParser.addParsedClass(AnnotationParser.java:569) ``` dumpAfterStart is what? System property or ????

Thanks, I just manually called `Server.dump()` after started and logged the result: ``` org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server@41e68d87[9.4.9.v20180320] - STARTED += QueuedThreadPool[qtp69329761]@421e361{STARTED,8 23 qtp69329761-23-acceptor-0@3e17a9a0-ServerConnector@6134f995{HTTP/1.1,[http/1.1]}{0.0.0.0:8080} ACCEPTING RUNNABLE @ sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.accept0(Native Method) prio=3 | +> 16 qtp69329761-16...

And yes you are correct on the containerIncludePattern. Based on previous issues, I have the following in my code: ```java // http://www.eclipse.org/jetty/documentation/9.3.x/configuring-webapps.html#container-include-jar-pattern // https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/issues/680 aWebAppCtx.setAttribute (WebInfConfiguration.CONTAINER_JAR_PATTERN, ".*\\.jar$|.*/classes/.*"); ```

@joakime No, the JDK is "Standard Windows 64 Bit JDK" - no mods at all @janbartel It seems to be an m2e launcher problem as stated by @digulla originally Concerning...

Here's my "tree /F" from that JDK folder if it helps: ``` │ COPYRIGHT │ javafx-src.zip │ LICENSE │ README.html │ release │ src.zip │ THIRDPARTYLICENSEREADME-JAVAFX.txt │ THIRDPARTYLICENSEREADME.txt │ ├───bin...

I tried to reproduce your issue but failed. There is indeed a case where whitespaces need to be around `+` and `-` and this is in the context of `math`...

Hahaha - good catch. I need to check this - interesting....

Good question - honestly I don't know. This is a very stupid error and requires quite some work in the lexer, because it is very specific to CSS expressions (declaration...