Blaine Bublitz

Parity would be great! This can now be solved with the Liftoff changes, correct?

@sttk I'm fine with those changes. The current behavior seems like a bug so we could probably release it in the same version as the other upcoming changes.

Due to how complex this issue has become, I'm going to move it to the 3.0 milestone because it might be breaking to some people's workflows.

:-1: on introducing magic into core. People need to learn their tools, including streams and node, if they are using gulp. This is just a documentation issue.

@callumacrae my thoughts are to explicitly add a merge-stream example to the README sample also. And maybe even in the API docs.

Yep!

@sttk if `opts.moduleName` were specified as the namespaced module, wouldn't the file need to be named something like `@capaj/knexfile.js`? That would be super weird. Can we add a test for...

I don't usually suggest breaking things into separate tasks and relying on dependencies, but I feel like that would be the best way to deal with this case since it...

@contra is this still a thing?

Removed the bug and enhancement tags, as this is mainly a documentation issue. Also, added help wanted tag if someone wants to write this up.