pgaudet

Results 1551 comments of pgaudet

multiple ways to say the same thing/ item for GO agenda

Hi @ValWood These relations seem pombase-specific. 1. In the GO-CAM modeling rules, a MF is **part of** a BP (not involved in) (but I dont think that's exactly your point)...

NTR: [proposed new term label] negative regulation of metaphase/anaphase transition of meiosis II

@val can you provide references?

Obsolete: [term labels and ID] GO:0098789 pre-mRNA cleavage required for polyadenylation

Should active subunits be annotated to 'endoribonuclease activity, producing 3'-phosphomonoesters'? or maybe we need a child, 'pre-mRNA endoribonuclease activity, producing 3'-phosphomonoesters'? Possibly we need to obsolete and review annotations, what...

Should NAD+ (CHEBI:15846) be a purines (CHEBI:26401)?

Not yet resolved in ChEBI

Should NAD+ (CHEBI:15846) be a purines (CHEBI:26401)?

Should be fixed in the Sept 1 ChEBI release

Should NAD+ (CHEBI:15846) be a purines (CHEBI:26401)?

Is there a ChEBI ticket about this ?

Obsolete GO:0051673 membrane disruption in another organism

In fact there *were* annotations, apologies Group | Number of EXP annotations -- | -- AgBase | 3 CACAO | 5 MGI | 2 UniProt | 26 WB | 2

Obsolete GO:0051673 membrane disruption in another organism

Great, that's a great start for next week's discussion.

Several of the children of 'biological process involved in interspecies interaction between organisms' should actually be children of 'symbiotic process' -

- [x] Point 1 - and following up on #20191 : moved 'biological process involved in interaction with symbiont' as a child of 'biological process involved in symbiotic interaction' -...

Several of the children of 'biological process involved in interspecies interaction between organisms' should actually be children of 'symbiotic process' -

We should discuss this on a future call. - I cannot implement Point 2 until we decide how to handle venoms - I will create tickets to review annotations to...