Peter Feerick

Do you have a preferred order for the review/merging of #1395, #1417 (this PR) and #1425? I'm thinking this one first since it's clear and is the active one, and...

Sorry for the delay, didn't see the notification for this. I'll trade you review of this for testing of #1548 since I know you have a TX12 also. 😁

btw, I was only holding reviewing this PR as https://github.com/EdgeTX/edgetx/pull/1481 needs to go in for 2.6.1 and whichever PR goes in first will need the other rebased... but I think...

Right, so finally playing with this on TX16S. Companion side of things seems fine. I've noticed a few... quirks... in behaviour ... probably because I'm using this the wrong way....

I'm afraid you'd probably have to do it in person, with a bunch of disguises and false names... given I'm part of the project my name won't be in the...

This just seems to leave it so you need to see an un-named one before you realise they're the GVs... 

Yeah, that's what I was thinking afterward, so am going to avoid that problem for now. 😆 On B&W they'll just have to continue to suffer with `GV#` as the...

Ok, so it sounds like all three PRs will be needed, and then we can re-evaluate. I'll try and get them merged in the next nightly.

Indeed... that was what I was alluding to re: iNav widget running at the same time - this is a resource constrained system and you are sharing resources. This isn't...

Ok, so should we go ahead with this as it is for 2.6, and hopefully fix it good as part of LVGL?