Peter Feerick
Peter Feerick
Well, this issue actually only applies to colorlcd anyway... as B&W screens are allowed to fully turn off, as they don't *require* a backllight to be viewable ;)
Just so this is crystal clear - the new config option will allow exactly what the old SF did - without the need for a SF. And since it will...
I can't reproduce this. With Companion 2.7.1 on Windows (11), if I load a ETX file for TX16S (or create a new one with a un-customised model), and then simulate...
I wouldn't expect to see this in 2.8 unless you intend to implement it :-P And keep in mind that's firmware AND companion support. So, if I'm a construction equip...
I was... that's why I didn't say 2.9 :-P Ok, so when the trims are disabled / trim channels enabled, in addition to the Tu, Td, etc, etc, inputs, there...
Indeed. Off to top of my head I can only think of probably two radios out of over a dozen or more of the supported ones that actually label the...
Essentially yes. but also adding the concept of having a configurable/discrete number of steps to move the full input range. i.e 2POS, 3POS, 4POS etc ... To do this right...
> I think we can have it simpler. Not really, as this is specifically what Robert is asking for ;) > But I like the idea of simulating xPOS switches...
> I would not call T1,T2 virtual as they are very physical :) In fact they could look physically as any other 3 position switch with UP and DOWN momentary...
> There's a compiler warning in the unit as well, which wasn't added by this but I thought I'd bring that up as well so maybe it can get fixed...