Peter Feerick
Peter Feerick
Is there scope / room for this to be added as an actual output in the future (not necessarily in this PR!), thus allowing for model specific use of the...
At the moment, nothing specific, but this is always a chicken and the egg scenario... if we don't make it available, it can't happen, but how do we know what...
Probably for the present time, I'd just leave it as it is... as a tool, as I said before, I don't see it making sense it being persistent/active once you...
@richardclli Can you let me know if you want this PR, changes made, or if it is not suitable.
No problem, just let me know when I should pay attention to this PR again ;)
Same - I see the logic/reasoning behind this, but I wonder if there is a better way to do this... On colour LCD there could be a toggle between the...
> impractical on UI side, because you would need to find space to indicate with folder is been used in a meaningful way, not so easy. Very easy - worse...
It's more an indication of a more problematic architectural issue with custom functions ... i.e. limited to options/data they can store. Yes, this should continue, we just need to figure...
> The question here is is the option of having user sounds urgent enough to warrant a 2.11 implementation. Not a chance (for the immediate future - how things look...
> Who knew you'd throw out 2.11 that quick? You really want me to remind you of the reminders? :rofl: :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes: Nah, perhaps retarget it for 2.11 branch at most,...