Peter Stangl
Peter Stangl
> @DavidMStraub We are talking particularly about FCNC b hadron decays. Since the slow down comes from integration, indeed as Jonas mentioned, in cases where the amplitudes are linear functions...
> @peterstangl : The implementation you talk of would be pretty amazing indeed! What observables do you have this implementation for? Any of the above ones perhaps? We completely understand...
@hoodyn thank you again for all the work you have put into this! Since your results differ from those in published papers, I think it would be good to do...
> Here's my notes about the leptonic kaon decays in EFT. (I haven'tfound any suitable text in the literature.) Might be helpful to understand the changes in the implementation. [kaon_decays.pdf](https://github.com/flav-io/flavio/files/5963600/kaon_decays.pdf)...
@hoodyn, I agree that the implementation has the two issues you have described. Thank you for reporting them and for your offer to fix them! For implementing the modifications, you...
@hoodyn, yes, I actually went through most of your implementation and the derivation in the notes you provided (which was very helpful!). I noticed some issues in the implementation of...
> Dear @peterstangl, I was wondering if @Felicia56 branch could be merged ? > > Thanks ! I still wanted to take a closer look at the latest changes and...
Thanks a lot to @Felicia56 !!!
> In the observables, only the absolute value or the square of the imaginary part of the amplitude enters. so it shouldn't matter whether it's the d->s or the s->d...
This issue has been fixed in PR #189.