Peter Ebden

When I created that fork, I wasn't planning for it to take over from this repo; we've used this library extensively and still are very fond of it, ideally I'd...

> I was just focusing on that the 16 latest commits from jessevdk:master has not merged into your repo yet, so I personally won't consider such fork official. Fair enough...

As I mentioned in #10 , we've been using a more basic approach with similar goals; among other things, we want to support an `[alias]` section analogous to git's. The...

Yup, seems useful and I don't think it will be particularly hard to do (we don't index by labels so it isn't a significant performance issue or anything)

Hmmm good spot, we do seem to be missing that. How silly, we have the tool and it supports taking extra tags, they're just not plumbed through :) Should be...

OK I take that back, this is a surprisingly deep rabbit hole. #534 works about 90% but coverage (and I suspect cgo) fail because they don't know how to re-filter...

no bad bot, we should just fix this

Thanks! Would you mind please opening this against https://github.com/please-build/java-rules instead? Those plugin repos are where future development of language-specific rules will happen. I have a couple of comments too but...

Bad bot, we're waiting to make breaking changes.

Technically it is breaking, yes; `plz cover -i` now means something different. Note that in general that is OK (e.g. `plz test -n 5` means something different from `plz -n...