Peter Broadhurst

There's a facility for that @awrichar so it should be pretty easy - take a look at #111

There's another related case, which is between private groups: 1. Parties A&B have a group `x`, and do transactions 1,2,3 2. Party C needs to be included, so a new...

A generic feature that would support this would be: - Add a new optional `header.after` (or similar) field on `Message` that takes a message ID directly - The field would...

Just replaying my understanding. Current behavior of FireFly `operations` as used by EVM Connect and FireFly Data Exchange implementations: - Operations have three states `Pending`,`Succeeded`, `Failed` - There are `output`...

@jebonfig - I've assigned this over to @awrichar for some deeper thinking, but this is a hard one to solve. It is the model of FireFly that everybody processes broadcast...

Would be great to put this architecture diagram into the README when you get a chance 🚀 🤖

I like `multiparty.networkNamespace` 👍 As the field is called `namespace` in all Multi-party data structures, calling it just `multiparty.networkName` seems like it might confuse things. On the Tokens front, that's...

Tokens: https://github.com/hyperledger/firefly/blob/dbd20c4add426b28dd6676dc73fd44f20585efac/internal/tokens/fftokens/fftokens.go#L515-L524 ... returns to handler, which exits the go-routine (closing the WebSocket) - so now that whole Tokens manager for the namespace is a 🧟 - the FF Core...

So from the surface of the issue, the IPFS network seems like it's not healthy. Each time a download request is made against Node 0, it should reach out to...

The thing that seems to be stopping the Events interface being identical, is the fact that we have `name` passed into `NewInstance(name string) Plugin`. e.g. somehow the instance of the...