Pedro Ramos
Pedro Ramos
/progress 100 POC for measuring adoption already merged.
I think we could close this issue since #859 has been already merged. cc @smoya @Amzani
IMO, I would opt for just adding a flag to `validate` command since the feature to be added should work like an extension for the validation process. Also I think...
> When you say `they use always a fixed version` you mean templates version right? this is something we could get from insights we are collecting (cc @peter-rr ) Sure!...
> ok, but then we're talking about July. So until July nobody will be able to use new AsyncAPI Generator @Amzani Should we add then this issue to the current...
Scope update: - [x] Discover how we can support both generators (v2 and < v2) Working on the implementation now.
@Souvikns I'd like to continue with the implementation of the issue but I won't be available for the next 2 weeks, then I guess you better pick it up so...
@Souvikns @derberg Should we close this PR as the bug related is already solved by https://github.com/asyncapi/cli/pull/1068 ?
> We can close it, but this PR adds some refactoring, that we can use. @Souvikns Yeah, we can keep it as a refactor then. Should we change the PR...