Piotr Dymacz

@neilsan1366 please, provide more details about the problem.

> Looks good, can we label it based on branch, too? Not with this one, it only analyzes paths of modified files. But what exactly do you have in mind,...

@Ansuel I'm fine with anything else but this solution exists now so why not use it till we have something more sophisticated?

> sure i wanted to put some comments just to get some feedback of my idea... > (ideally the bot should be hosted on github servers) Do you have a...

@Ansuel > Needs to be hosted but permit more flexibility than simple actions... And needs to be hosted/maintained by someone. We should limit amount of additional services and work around...

@Ansuel > This is my concern... Anyway the bot **is so easy that once done it doesn't require that much changes**... Whenever I hear something like this, I run away...

@Ansuel I will rebase and look again into this in next days, thanks for reminder!

@aparcar done. @ynezz thanks for all your comments,so far, I failed to find time to address them but will try again, this time harder (at least wasting buildbots resources is...

@devbis are you still willing to get this merged? Personally I would prefer to get those devices supported first in upstream (kernel + U-Boot) and then backport that to OpenWrt.

@sloncho a whole `dmesg` output might be helpful here.