Ratchanan Srirattanamet
Ratchanan Srirattanamet
Err... Sorry, should have been more clear. This issue is about getting big uint64 value _from_ introspected object/call. The PR (#322), however, only solve passing BigInt as an argument _to_...
I've made some initial implementation in my repo: https://github.com/peat-psuwit/node-gtk/commits/transfer-fully-in_-_anti-leak I've made `WrapperFromBoxed` accept a new enum `MemoryOwnership`, whose choices are `COPY` (equals to `mustCopy = true`), `LEASED` (equals to `mustCopy...
No code update from the last time. For the return value's copy, I forgot to mention that it's copied only when the return value's transfer is not `TRANSFER_FULL` (previously it...
Well, in this case it's a boxed object (I have to put it the title...)
> For all the changes it makes, the PR only has a single test. Is it really the only case affected by these changes? Well, the thing is that I...
It's a different problem. This one try to prevent use-after-free for transfer-full, in argument, while #302 concerns about memory leakage. Both are memory problems, but of different kinds... This one...
So... the packages available in our PPA is always built from git repositories in our own custom CI setup. To have a package in our PPA requires a git repository...
> Is there a previous Container Linux version where you weren't seeing this problem? I can't remember any. IIRC I've seen this problem since I initially set up the VM...
Re-tested with cups-snap 2.4.2-1 (760). The issue still persists.
To be honest, I'm not sure yet... Currently what we definitely should have is a dedicated page which helps porters coming from Xenial to move their ports to Focal. We'll...