Markus Sabadello

Hello @JelleMillenaar thanks for your feedback..! The DID WG had long discussions if (and to what extent) DID Resolution should be defined in DID Core. The conclusion was that DID...

> If you (@peacekeeper) ever have some time, I would love to schedule a call to discuss our DID method. @JelleMillenaar Yes I would definitely be interested in talking and...

> Anything can be a DID subject Yes, but this doesn't mean that DID method names should be used to identify certain types or classes of subjects. I'm not aware...

This approach would also violate rule 1 in https://www.w3.org/TR/did-core/#method-syntax: _A [DID method](https://www.w3.org/TR/did-core/#dfn-did-methods) specification MUST define **exactly one** method-specific [DID scheme](https://www.w3.org/TR/did-core/#dfn-did-schemes) that is identified by **exactly one** method name_ In my...

Also, it's not clear to me what the verifiable data registry would be in this case? The specification seems to show abstract API interfaces that can be called, but there...

> Again, do you have a link where this requirement stated? I already provided the relevant links and references in an earlier comment. Your specifications do NOT meet the requirements....

> an arrangement Actually I remember that arrangement differently than it is expressed in this thread.

> What is your evidence? > > Please don't make assertions based on what someone does or does not remember - the truth is what's recorded in the call: https://us02web.zoom.us/rec/share/gllobsEiHYk_fsSjoaOQA3b3WQjl_MbFcw1m3XeuXhKfZqL9rKmTUUyNh9IqMAZL.wbw7Bla6LkMzA6d3...

@mwherman2000 We both had typos in our comments above, and we both fixed them now, which is visible in the comment edits. You wrote 1st Nov 2025 and meant 1st...

-1 to merging this, for reasons already explained earlier in this thread.