Markus Sabadello
Markus Sabadello
Okay thanks for explanations, fine with me to change to non-LD JSON :) Any suggestions for media type? E.g. - `application/json;profile="https://w3id.org/did-resolution"` - `application/did-resolution+json` Also, should we just use the same...
Addressed by https://github.com/w3c/did-resolution/pull/152, marking as pending-close.
@mwherman2000 What do you mean by "DID-Reference Protocol"? I don't think that exists.
This isn't a "protocol", it's just an ABNF syntax for the DID Reference. And probably this syntax definition should be removed here, since it's already in the main DID spec....
I believe that this issue can be closed, considering that the last comment suggests that the discussion be continued in this issue https://github.com/w3c-ccg/did-spec/issues/167, which has been closed by now.
Actually, I take that back. I feel like the original comment in this issue (clarify the role of DID Resolution to other DID specs) is separate from the closed "DID...
> Has a PR been created for this? No not yet, this is currently assigned to @mccown, like issue https://github.com/w3c/did-resolution/issues/17
I think this has been addressed by https://github.com/w3c/did-resolution/pull/151
I wrote some language about this here: https://github.com/w3c/did-resolution/pull/178 I'm thinking maybe we transfer this issue back to the DID Resolution repo, and close it once that PR is merged?
You're right, at the moment the `accept` option can only contain a single media type, but I don't remember why we made it like this. I think what you suggest...