Pascal Dürsteler

Did you had a look at #545 ? Just came across this as well. Or if it helps, you could specify it in your controller with decorates_association :document with: ExampleNamespace::DocumentDecorator

Just tried it out, switching from the 1-6-stable branch to 1.6.4 seems to work for me.

Jumping on the bandwagon of "@dimaip I guess it's still awful" since it's already 2 years ago since the last comment 😆 The current solution works, but after using it...

+1, besides it does not really matter since you can mix both (unless they're in the same file)

@goosetav I see your point. Personally, I'd pick the option that requires less effort to maintain and update the gem. If font awesome is now provided as SCSS, I'd migrate...

Done, see #37

:+1: would also contribute to a v2, the sooner it starts the better! Maybe some points can be discussed in their own issue, but then we should add a label...

Thanks, added my name to it. Looking forward to the IRC.

Haven't heard something unfortunately.. Still would be on it!

I've just started doing the same as @natebird does; Skipping an interactor in the interactor itself. However this feels wrong because I'd expect the interactor to raise an error if...