Hung PHAN

> The log is very wierd. I guess it's probably due to some pyg update. I'll take a look at it later. In the meantime is it possible you could...

> The log is very wierd. I guess it's probably due to some pyg update. I'll take a look at it later. In the meantime is it possible you could...

> The log is very wierd. I guess it's probably due to some pyg update. I'll take a look at it later. In the meantime is it possible you could...

> The log is very wierd. I guess it's probably due to some pyg update. I'll take a look at it later. In the meantime is it possible you could...

I checked and saw the latest update from ogbn-mag is 7 months ago, which torch-geometric-1.6.3 was the latest version at that time. I tried to run the preprocess_.py but it...

> The log is very wierd. I guess it's probably due to some pyg update. I'll take a look at it later. In the meantime is it possible you could...

> The log is very wierd. I guess it's probably due to some pyg update. I'll take a look at it later. In the meantime is it possible you could...

> Hi: Thanks for figuring out the problem. Do you happen to know which part makes your previous experiment fails? > […](#) > On Fri, Sep 17, 2021, 21:27 Hung...

Hi Here is what I got from running the eval....py `/home/hungphd/anaconda3/envs/py38/bin/python /home/hungphd/git/oldCommits/pyHGT/ogbn-mag/eval_ogbn_mag.py --task_type variance_reduce --prev_norm --last_norm --use_RTE +--------------+--------------------+ | Parameter | Value | +--------------+--------------------+ | data_dir | dataset/OGB_MAG.pk | +--------------+--------------------+...

No I haven't since I downgrade my torch-geometric to your code version. I will try it after I finish my experiments on current torch-geometric. It seems that in the new...