pcwysoc

@coreyostrove that didn't seem to work. I've generated a working example: [NumGaugeParamsBug.ipynb.zip](https://github.com/sandialabs/pyGSTi/files/13603318/NumGaugeParamsBug.ipynb.zip). @kmrudin mentioned to me that there were/are reasons that target wasn't static, since in the creation of the...

The returned value is -1 always.

Added another point about report generation.

@kmrudin and I added another 10 points.

@rileyjmurray Could you explain a bit more when .ravel() can be used instead of .flatten()? I'm confused about when a copy is necessary.

@sserita @coreyostrove I second @kmrudin's point that it might be worth developing modelpacks that include the CR gate. It appears that IBM may be replacing CNOT as the directly accessible...

I have one more bug report--would you prefer I send it over email, comment it here, or add it to the initial comment? Thanks for following up on this! I'll...

I'm trying to figure out where to upload that right now. Where did you put the Wildcard file?

Just updated the main comment--ran into another issue when trying to write an IBMQ Experiment.

Here's another aspect that I don't necessarily want to add to the main comment since it isn't a bug fix. Currently, quantum instruments don't have an equivalent to "EmbeddedOp" and...