Pier Luigi Buttigieg

Before - that information is more general than my additions, so should appear first

@mslarae13 yes, but @turbomam to verify content is still current

Thanks for raising this important issue, @raissameyer: This was discussed in yesterday's CIG call with @pyilmaz @ramonawalls @only1chunts @lschriml and @pbuttigieg As the call focused on the symbiont-associated package, this...

+1 we could definitely use this in ENVO to help with SOPs for the UNESCO/IOC-IODE GOOS EOVs and GEO BON's EBVs as well as SDGIO's APs for UN SDGs :grin:...

>Maybe this could be encoded in OWL and the human definition could be more human-friendly? Bringing this back for [`objective specification`](http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/IAO_0000005) and other directive information entities needed over in the...

Thanks for the response @zhengj2007! >@pbuttigieg 'objective specification' is associated with 'planned process' and two relations defined in OBI: > >achieves_planned_objective (OBI_0000417) >domain: 'planned process', range: 'objective specification' >inverse relation,...

If there's no further input on this, I think we'll have to go with the approach [posted above](https://github.com/information-artifact-ontology/IAO/issues/214#issuecomment-489124246) for now (we have a time-limited project). Very interested to see if...

Thanks @zhengj2007 ! > The objectives of a subProcess and the process which is part_of, generally won't hold 'part_of' relation. Agreed - this is why I noted that I doubted...

So there is no compact way to say that Objective B is a sub-objective of Objective A? We would have to have ObjA and ObjB, and then Process A and...

>I question the use cases for named classes for objectives. If you truly need to represent an objective rather than a process (and are you sure you do?) then use...