Pavlenex
Pavlenex
I'll close this one, there hasn't been much interest in it.
Good question, it's been a bit controversial, I'll add it to dev meeting agenda today.
@Goro2030 I am still not sure I completely understand what is it that you guys would like to have. My understanding is that a server admin should have a control...
Going back to this issue, since it's been tagged on 1.13, I'll outline the scope and the intention, but the design side is still something pending @dstrukt's mock. We discussed...
This issue is being closed, since it's quite old and the scope of it is not clearly defined. The issue is broken down in favor of 1. #5674 - allow...
@ketominer @Kukks @rockstardev What are we going to do with this one? It's an old issue.
As discussed, in 1.9.0 we'll be abstracting things from "integrations" which makes that tab dead, so we should probably close this one.
@kukks said he will add a permisson tag and tackle this one, later on expand it via role manager.
Is this something we'd still want to do? Don't recall people requesting this @Kukks ?