Paul Millar

Indeed. For me, there's two ways of looking at this. It is true that it is an API change. Therefore, it has the possibility to break existing applications. However, equally,...

OK. Should I update the patch to introduce a new method (similar to `JSONObject#toString` but that never returns `null`), or should I drop this pull-request?

At the (very real) risk of mentioning what people already know, here is some additional information that might be helpful. A similar problem was reported against [curl](https://curl.se/) as [CVE-2018-1000007](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-1000007) (a...

@youennf Do you happen to know whether, with this change, Safari drops the Authorization header with different origin redirections?

@whimboo, at least for the remote driver, the `shadow_root` property contains [an explicit check](https://github.com/SeleniumHQ/selenium/blob/trunk/py/selenium/webdriver/remote/webelement.py#L239) that rejects Firefox. As far as I can see, something like: ``` shadow_root = driver.execute_script('return arguments[0].shadowRoot',...

I mean at the network level, but the argument is somewhat similar for both storage and network/transport. Quite a few years ago, I was at a filesystem mini-conference where HPC...

Hi Adrien, It looks like the door simply cannot keep up with the number of clients as-is. There are a few reasons why this might be happening: 1. the door...

Progress report on the three ways for solving this issue: 1. **Fix the server certificates.** I don't think there's much we can do here. The problem is with the remote...

Just an update here. I think the gPlazma documentation is a little, err, "conflicted" at the moment. A general philosophy is that "The Book" would contain (amongst other things) three...

Thanks for reporting the problem with the migration script. I've created a separate issue to track the progress on fixing this. The work on that migration script largely stalled due...