Paul E. Jones

You can certainly do that, though any official channel will complain about the license terms. I hate the GNU license and refuse to license my code that way. I do...

There's really not a registration system, per se, for "publicly available source code" (as they describe it in the law). Rather, a notification (i.e., email) has to be sent to...

The source started out the same, but the version on Github has had some superficial changes made to the code (e.g., some folks did not like the new // style...

Modifying the Makefile to have that is easy, but there's the risk it might not work as expected. For example, what if I set it to some value in Makefile?...

Are people trying to use the GitHub code or the code on aescrypt.com? I assume the latter since that looks like the Makefile there. However, I thought that gentoo and...

I updated the Linux source. The SHA-256 hash is 263c0abd1da22d8cffd181a2d99c6d90410e5c2c6deeb1d6286f01b08a2f6763. Version number was updated to 3.15.

And since I was in there, I did a lot of cleanup. I just published v3.16.

While that's true, I don't want to make an effort to prevent it. It might be possible to prevent some instances, it's possible that the same file has different names...

I'll bet a normal link on Linux would fool even the python code. One option that might work is to lock the input file exclusively. But that's got other negative...

Very nice. I didn't expect it to be that thorough.