Paul Elliott

Hi! I agree with you that the spec says this is an octet stream, and therefore invite you to push your PR Many thinks, Paul.

CI Fail is due to 'missing' error code. I could fix this by defining it in file for the time being, if this is acceptable.

Apologies for the force push. As per Gilles request I have not only made changes, but also moved various parts of the code into different locations, so it was going...

The CMake code is looking specifically for Python3, and will fail if all it can find is Python2. However, as the `REQUIRED` keyword is not used, the build will not...

I need to have a think about the best way to solve this.

So, we get to my second suspicion. Multiple full installations of Python on the same machine are unfortunately not uncommon, especially on MacOS, unfortunately. If you look at the two...

I have not seen this used before, but this seems fine to me, albeit as you say, a little confusing in the way they word things.

> I used Github to try to bring this fork up to date with upstream/development (no conflicts) but it created a merge PR. Sorry about this. @paul-elliott-arm should I force...

> > Looks pretty good to me, however I am curious as to why the `psa_unregister_read() `in `psa_destroy_key()` remains unguarded. > > `psa_destroy_key` was covered by #8764, do you mean...

> In the description it says > > > All calls to psa_register_read, psa_unregister_read, psa_key_slot_state_transition, psa_wipe_key_slot and psa_key_slot_has_readers are performed under the global mutex > > but there are a...