Pascal

Can you maybe try with debug output as described in the README? Maybe it will show some more info

I'm really sorry, but this action can only use the info that the GitHub API is giving. The only way I see is to capture screenshots of the PR, together...

> this action can only use the info that the GitHub API is giving This is technically not true, of course. The experience with the GH API has been quite...

I don't think it's a bug in the action, we are simply calling the API, using [octokit](https://github.com/octokit/octokit.js) (the official GH client) https://github.com/pascalgn/automerge-action/blob/main/lib/merge.js#L270-L281 ```js async function getPullRequest(octokit, pullRequest) { logger.debug("Getting latest...

@D4nte Yes, why not! Feel free to create a PR for it! 👍

>Currently when automerging a PR that only has one commit, the title of the merge will be the title of that commit. While automerging a PR that has multiple commits...

Sorry for not getting back to you sooner! This should actually be working already, did you try setting `MERGE_COMMIT_MESSAGE: "pull-request-title"`?

I don't use this feature myself, so I won't have time to look into this. But if you create a PR, I will look at it as soon as possible!...

No, this is currently not possible. Option `MERGE_METHOD: "rebase"` will merge without merge commit, but it does not check if HEAD is up-to-date first (what ff-only does) Feel free to...

We're using Octokit, which can be passed a baseUrl in the configuration: https://octokit.github.io/rest.js/v18 I don't have access to GH Enterprise, so feel free to create a PR for this! 👍