Martin Hoffmann

That should be something to add, indeed. I’m not sure where it should live – probably not in `rdata` directly as it is a use of TXT records not an...

I would indeed only want to have parsing/composing of the record data as part of _domain._ Parsing should probably be an iterator that returns terms. For composing, the usual strategy...

The idea of `domain::base::net` was to provide `IpAddr` and friends with everything that is possible in a `no_std` environment if `std` isn’t available. If it is, they are just re-exports...

(We need threads ;) ) > Thinking about CIDR I would rather have a dedicated type in the _spf_ module if there isn’t a commonly accepted standard type for it....

> @partim With `CharStr` do you mean `CharStr` with `Octs` being a generic type? Correct. > I've another question regarding domain names. Spf record might contain domain names and I...

I want to say draw the line at tokens and leave their interpretation to external code? We probably shouldn’t include too much code that isn’t strictly DNS.

@Bas-Man You definitely should! Maybe this is all that @tokcum needs? It seems your crate uses `String` to store the data. While that should work with _domain_ and is likely...

We are using the [_octseq_](https://github.com/NLnetLabs/octseq) for being generic over the type of octets sequence to be used. So instead of, say, just `Spf` that uses `String`, you’d have `Spf that...

@tokcum No rush! If you would like some early feedback, you can always open a PR and mark it as a draft.

Is this something we want to as part of this PR or might it be better to just merge the PR and make an issue for later?